Bookmark and Share
My Photo

Oxford England

  • The End of the Road
    These photos are separated from my Travels album because Oxford is something of a second home. I still manage to visit it several times a year. So the pathway between Manotick and Oxford is well trodden and I can likely do it with my eyes closed - and probably have on more than one occasion.

Royal Roads University

  • Hatley Castle
    This series of photographs was taken over the last few years. I have stayed at the campus of Royal Roads on several occasions and I have been repeatedly impressed by the grounds. They are in many ways a little-known treasure.


  • Kafka Statue
    Here is a selection of pictures I have taken during my travels over the last few years. I am very obviously an amateur photographer and it is not uncommon for me to forget my camera altogether when packing. What the pictures do not convey is the fact that in these travels I have met, and gotten to know, a great many interesting people.

Manotick Ontario

  • Springtime in Manotick
    Manotick Ontario Canada is the part of Ottawa that I call home. Much of Manotick stands on an island in the Rideau River. Interestingly, the Rideau Canal, which runs through and around the river, was recently designated a World Heritage Site by the United Nations. So this means that the view from my backyard is in some way on a similar par with the Egyptian Pyramids - although the thought strikes me as ridiculous.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

« The Barnaclization of Systems | Main | Tinsel and the Tree »

January 18, 2009


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jose Joaquin Perez Krumenacker

What would have happened with the French revolution and for that matter with our contemporary history if they have simply added the strength of "Diversity" discovered by our Canadian geese to their "Equality, Liberty and Fraternity" cry?

Joe Gollner

This is a fascinating question.

Taking up the French Revolution first, I would imagine that the incorporation of "diversity" into the battle cry, and the associated esprit, would have taken that uprising to a quite different conclusion. The downfall of the French revolution - its literal degeneration into a bloodsoaked farce followed by the despotism of a diminutive artillery officer - can be attributed to successive waves of insularity overtaking different groups who found themselves, for a short time at least, in power. This impulse towards insularity, as the exact opposite of welcoming diversity, kept the guillotine well supplied with customers for many years.

There are, of course, similar examples that can be cited and we could go forward or backwards from the French revolution in history to find them. There definitely seems to be a tension between "diversity" on one hand and "unity", or forms thereof, on the other. I suppose "unity" can be equated to "fraternity" in the French revolutionary version and the question that arises is what distinquishes constructive unity from destructive insularity? What then is the dynamic that leads communities towards constructive, inclusive unity and away from what would appear, at least historically, to be our more normal and more destructive state?

Jose Joaquin Perez Krumenacker

THANKS Joe. What a fascinating response that was.

I fully agree with you that "unity" can be equated to "fraternity" that in turn can be formulated as a relative "us".

On the other hand this "crisis of globalization" that we are currently experiencing, and is wrongly interpreted by most of us as a simple economical problem, is a very serious "cultural" problem due to the lack of "ONENESS" that can be equated to "diversity" that can in turn be formulated as "ALL OF US".

Jose Joaquin Perez Krumenacker

That "Ideal World Democracy" is precisely that "Uthopic All of Us the People of the World"

Joe Gollner

This is exchange Jose is sparking a number of ideas and, before long, will likely lead to at least one new post.

When we think about the current global economic mess, and about the changing forms of "globalization", we are reminded that many unities exist. Sometimes they compete and sometimes they collaborate. At other times they conflict and at yet different times they merely co-exist. If a unity is defined by its end, its purpose, then we see how some unities will be constructive while others may be profoundly destructive.

If we take the current economic crisis as one case, there are a myriad number of contributing factors that can be highlighted. The most important one, I believe, is the formation of a particularly selfish unity around which a large portion of the world's economy has been wrapped in the last 20 or so years. This unity is (and this is probably going to get me into trouble) the baby-boom generation in North America, and to a slightly lesser extent western Europe. This generation has been charting a steady path towards the golf course and has been attempting to pursue a retirement from labour similar to, but aggrandized upon, that taken by the proceeding generation (who I refer to as the war generation, and who, I would add, earned it and undertook it in part ot make way for the succeeding babyboomers).

This process has driven an investment market and a hunger for continuously improving returns extracted from continuously expanding growth. In turn, this spawned a business culture and process that became progressively more refined, abstract, calculating, and relentless. I usually refer to the business culture in question as the "MBA culture" (and thereby getting me into even deeper trouble). This process continued until cracks started appearing in the foundations underpinning the resulting financial edifice.

Under this process, what passes as globalization is actually a subversion of it - with one particular unity driving its interests over those of all others. This process doubtlessly caused much hardship during its growth and, as we are seeing, still more as it falters.

It would be preferrable for there to be a process and a governing model that accommodated more unities and that facilitated better competition and collaboration (with these two things being less far apart than is often imagined). This would constitute of unity of unities, if I can call it that.

The path towards a better model however is not likely one that tries to ignore or overthrow a unity as massive and formidable as that which holds sway today. It would be more practical, I would submit, to advance modifications to the model that facilitate inclusiveness and improve the constructiveness of the entire operation.

In exchanges in the past with colleagues from around the world who raged against the reigning world order and sought to advance wildly different ones, all I could add in the end was a rather omninous "good luck with that". History has been very harsh with overly abrupt diversions from the momentum of events - with the French Revolution providing only the most comical example.

There is, however, real hope that change can be realized and that we can make concrete steps towards a constructive global unity - even if the path towards this goal is different than many might suspect. And it may be that the current troubles provide an opportunity to effect some of the necessary changes.

Jose Joaquin Perez Krumenacker

I am not talking about the need for global revolution because that would simply be fighting over an impossible global "new way of doing", and a new and awaiting Napoleon (global this time) might profit from the subsequent blood shedding.

Our real challenge as Humans is to Accept our Diversity and Find our ONENESS "beyond" our multiple though partial economic, political, social (religious included) and cultural "unities".

We are Looking for a Global Human Way of Being.

Joe Gollner

Yes, Jose you are right - on both counts. And I appreciated this from the outset. My reference to some of the more extreme cases of "revolutionary fervour" was rooted in my own encounters (usually within academic circles) with a line of thinking that manifestly did not appreciate the consequences of abrupt change or the attendant risks. Again, finding the unity in unities is the only way. A constructive global unity would be one that seeks to built and sustain an environment that accommodates and encourages distinctive unities, that even hatches new ones, and that facilitates fair and productive interactions amongst them all. Globalization with a human face.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)